View Single Post
Old 05-28-2009, 03:28 PM   #17 (permalink)
roachboy
 
roachboy's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: essex ma
notoriety is too broad a category to do the work you want it to do, will. in history, for example, some of the folk with the greatest degree of notoriety were at the center of campaigns to drum them out of the profession. one of the pretexts was plagiarism---in that case, it was little more than a form of invective meant to cover over the real motives, which were personal/political. being at the center of such a thing doesn't help get grants. similarly, you could say that among "journalists" (which i put in quotes in order to extend it this far) limbaugh has a considerable degree of notoriety; other paragons of everything good about the press like geraldo rivera come to mind.

you probably mean reputation. but even there, this doesnt mean a single thing because what constructs it isn't made up of a single set of attributes. and there's no particular agreement about what constitutes reputation. there are companies that like to count the number of times a particular author is cited by others--these are marketed as an index of reputation--but the numbers take no account for the type of citation: they critical or otherwise. there are a bunch of other problems with these indices, but you get the idea.

connections is more accurate--who you're connected to, how much influence they have, etc. that gets you grants. reputation can be part of that but it isn't the same thing. nowhere near as effective.

the point is that the whole idea of plagiarism hinges on the status of an individual author--the name is supposed to function as a guarantee (hedged in by others of course)---television simply doesn't work in the same way---shakran knows way more about this than i do--but it seems that the central guarantee of accuracy in television is the sense of being-present that footage provides. contextual information typically is geared around the footage. if footage didn't serve this function, it'd be hard to imagine how fox news would be confused with an unproblematic information outlet.
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear

it make you sick.

-kamau brathwaite
roachboy is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360