Quote:
Originally Posted by genuinegirly
I think that Infinite_loser has done an admirable job of defending his standpoint. He is eloquent and well-researched. He has done an excellent job of representing an unpopular opinion.
Whether or not Infinite_Loser believes what he writes, he is presenting an excellent argument. I admire him for his choice to debate in this fashion.
|
If his standpoint is about parsing the semantics of the constitution, he's doing a bang up job. It's still unclear why he's arguing his case so strongly