Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Jazz
For the record, Willravel is against the sybian, dildos, vibrators, blow-up dolls, strap-ons, sex swings, anal beads, various fruits and vegetables, the Fleshlight, vibrating panties and any other sex toy that I've forgotten.
|
Aww crap, good point. Amendment: consent
from any life form.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Polar
Derwood, you say incenstuous relationships will never be approved, even if plutonic but Willravel is already stating that the standard he has would allow it.
|
They may very well never be approved by law. Still, the main stigma attached to incest, that offspring would be genetically weaker, is demonstrably false unless incest has taken place over several generations. If that verifiable information can be made common knowledge, the only real objection to incest would be the same as homosexuality: namely religion and "the ick factor". I don't think either of these constitutes a good enough reason to outlaw social rights.
But this is just my opinion, and no it's not all that common. Most social progressives do not support legalization of polygamy or incestuous relationships. I'm in the extreme minority.
Edit: I should get some award for inspiring The_Jazz to type "sybian".