you move the line one case at a time. The line will never move to incest (even if it's a non-sexual, monetary/benefit based partnership), and the NAMBLA argument is moot because minors can't enter a legal contract.
And again, look at this slightly modified version of your post:
Quote:
If marraige is no longer defined as just between a white man and a white woman, then it can no longer be defined as just between two people.
They state that there is no argument for removing just the racial restrictions. If they can remove that, there is no way they can argue against removing the number restrictions.
|
Those who opposed interracial marriage found that slope was nowhere close to being as slippery as they had forecast....