|
I hear what you are saying, roachboy, but the 'heading down this path' should not necessarily be saved just for me.
On 5/25/ at 10:48am I gave a detailed factual message to Willravel explaining why his assumption of what the article says is incorrect.
His response was to post the first sentence of the article. Nothing more.
Then later, an article basing his entire claim on a single anonymous source. I give two concrete examples as to why anonymous sources should not be considered the best sources. The result is a response from you.
I give concrete reasons why the 'anonymous' source should be doubted. You, like Willravel provide none to assume he should be taken seriously.
Your standard should be applied evenly when calling for a specific type of give and take.
|