|
You say you don't want 'snarky' comments but all you do is give the first line of the article you provided. A line that is refuted later in the very same article. An article I commented on in length pointing out specifically where you are in error.
The only assumption can be that you could not refute what I said so you chose to simply post the first line of the article again. That is hardly being 'constructive.'
The article given in your blog link is from the UK and provides no source for the 'information' included. "The plans, disclosed to The Sunday Times last week..." Provided by whom? You aren't the least bit concerned about the honesty/veracity of the source? It could even be Israel planting disinformation to further dissuade Iran BECAUSE they have no intention of nuking them first. This is the standard of proof you use?
Tell me, why would this be given to a news outlet in the UK, but not the US? Why haven't any of the US news outlets picked up on it and presented it as fact?
Your article provides no proof, no source, no outside corroboration....no validity.
|