Quote:
Originally Posted by Infinite_Loser
Well, first of all, waterboarding isn't unconstitutional nor illegal (In the U.S.). You might want it to be, but it isn't and referencing them as such doesn't do much to help your argument. But, moving on. The reason we waterboard suspected terrorists is because they're suspected terrorists who don't operate under the guidelines set forth by the Geneva Convention. They frequently target civilians, behead PoW's or journalists and have publicly stated that they won't stop until the opposing side is wiped out. We don't waterboard children because they're crimes don't necessitate being waterboarded. The same with priests or white collar criminals. Hell, we wouldn't even torture normal PoW's who were organized under a common banner.
|
Not only is it cruel and unusual punishment, but there is actual legal precedent of the US prosecuting people for it.
This sort of "slippery slope" fallacy that you are trying to cling to here is just that, a fallacy. Claiming that it can't be torture because then anything that is unpleasant is torture is a great example of that fallacy.