Debate --> de-bait?
Is this a hint?
I think so.
It's this easy.
Belief or the lack of such is, at the level of politics, a simple vague category for the peasant-sorting.
The reason it is such a vague and often touchy topic is that in theologistics, the plane it draws its relevance from, the basic assumption is the protection of the Instinct/Conscience borderline, and borders are just imaginary lines that make people feel self-important. It makes me wanna eat God, God it ticks me off. It's divvying up our psyche's natural inclinations. 'Nuff said.
---------- Post added at 10:55 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:50 PM ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cynosure
People ask the question, "If God created everything, then who created God?" because they know that everything in our universe – including the universe itself – has a beginning (and an end, for that matter). However, people who ask such a question about God are thinking in mundane and temporal terms, and they are thinking too small about God, for God is not part of our universe. Thus God is not, nor was He ever, subject to our universe's laws and limitations.
God exists outside of our universe, and it may very well be that everything outside our universe is God, and that our universe is in fact contained (and maintained) within God. Thus, God is not subject to our universe's laws/limitations of time, space, creation, decay, the speed of light, etc.
This old and trite "line of reasoning" is nonsensical, and not really worth contemplating if you're earnest about knowing God.
|
Amen, words are based in strict
en tempora at best, reality itself bears no words that aren't written, only itself.
As another layer, reality has no words, man is resident in existence, words are made by man. Ideology is at the bottom of the food chain.