Quote:
Originally Posted by Cynthetiq
No, I don't know if it shows worse behavior, those that have seen them indicate that it's not worse that what has already been released. If the point is prosecution, then prosecute. If there is not going to be be any prosecution, then what is the point of releasing them to the general public? But so far the idea here is to use the photos as a political football to dress down the previous administration and the people that worked within it.
|
You were on the train and then derailed. The point is to make sure that there is prosecution if it's warranted. This is all a political game right now, it's not about right and wrong. That's what releasing the photos will do, create the public outcry necessary to bring this back to what this is about, that what was done was
wrong, plain and simple.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cynthetiq
Yes, AVAILABLE to the prosecutors is not the same thing as printed in ever newspaper and shown on every 11pm news. We didn't get to see the photos for OJ Simpson's trial nor do we see them for all the murder and homicides.
|
You don't read many tabloids, otherwise you would've seen Nicole's head barely still attached. The photos were never officially released and there already was an outcry for justice, but they certainly fueled more pressure being put on the part of the prosecution.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cynthetiq
I've not ever said make the evidence unavailable for prosecution.
|
Technically, you weren't very clear either way, just saying to not show them, so I'll give you that one.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cynthetiq
Both you and willravel need to learn to read what I've written and not what you want it to say.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cynthetiq
Oh right will you're right again.
He said he was recognized in the photo... I didn't see that published anywhere in the article he's quoted in, he said that once the photos were released his family ASKED him about it...
but I'm sure you knew about it... cuz you're absolutely right again!!! it's amazing you're like Kreskin!
|
I'd want the above quote to say something that isn't a troll.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cynthetiq
Well, I don't know about you but it seems that I'm in a discussion with someone who can see words that aren't in the article posted nor any other article or source.
|
So that means we're allowed to openly mock people who we feel aren't understanding what we're saying? When was this rule change put in place? Is this a staff only thing or site wide? If you disagree with anything I've said above, am I free to mock you as well?