View Single Post
Old 05-04-2009, 08:36 AM   #48 (permalink)
Willravel
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by FoolThemAll View Post
No, not really. How does it show opposition to property rights?
Fortunately, I don't have to demonstrate that at all, as I never made mention of property rights, but simply property. Remember? "Pro-property"? Besides, liberals aren't anti-property rights, they simply don't have materialism built as strongly into their/our economic models. We're okay having a little less so that others can have a little more.
Quote:
Originally Posted by FoolThemAll View Post
Now you're just being dodgy. I'll put it another way: where in that passage does it indicate that conservatives are wrong to keep matters of charity voluntary?
This isn't speaking to the ideology I was referencing, though. When I was talking about class divergence, I was talking about being okay with some people being incredibly poor and some people being incredibly rich, but moreover the fact that conservatives prop up the rich as if they are better than everyone else, not having to pay their share of taxes, not being prosecuted for serious crimes, getting away with more than any poor person ever could hope to. When, in the passage (John 13:12-17, iirc), Jesus was washing their feet, he was symbolizing the fact that even those in the most laudable positions in society are still servants of that society and they are not truly greater than any "servant", or poorer person. That kind of equality is better represented by the left today than it is by the right.
Quote:
Originally Posted by FoolThemAll View Post
But as I pointed out, you're comparing apples and oranges. You're comparing what Jesus says people should do to what modern conservatives believe people should be allowed to do. If you aren't making the jump from one to the other, what are you doing? Exactly what kind of contradiction do you see here?
No, most conservatives I know believe that everyone should behave in that way in order for the free market to work correctly. If some people are pushing for the government to help the poor more or for more socialized programs, they, according to what I understand to be a conservative mindset, are hindering the market. So it is, in fact, what one "should" do when discussing conservatism.
Quote:
Originally Posted by FoolThemAll View Post
You claimed contradictions. Burden's yours.
I said I was flabbergasted. I still am. I've met the burden to convince myself.

You really can't list anything?
Willravel is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360