|
so essentially, otto, you're arguing that there is no difference between the united states and a non-state "terrorist"group.
which kinda follows from your previous hyperbolics in which you implicitly equated the bush "war on terror"and world war 2, which you had to do in order to make your nonsensical claim regarding dresden.
your position would seem to be anything goes.
then because you politically and/or emotionally oppose obama, you equate the release of the photos of torture being carried out by the united states with terrorism.
then you say the photos are "political propaganda"...
classic.
there's really nothing to be said about this nonsense.
how about this:
i take it that you oppose the release of the photos.
do you have any actual arguments as to why?
or is it simply that the obama administration is doing the releasing?
i'm inclined to think the latter is the case.
if that's true, then there may well be no real arguments--you wouldn't need them---you just oppose it because of the source.
but that avoids everything of substance about why torture is a problem.
i can see why you'd want to avoid the actual questions.
so far you have.
so what's your actual position on this? is torture cool so far as you're concerned? if the party positions were flipped around, would you feel the same way?
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear
it make you sick.
-kamau brathwaite
|