Quote:
Originally Posted by ratbastid
Naturally Kramus hasn't pointed out how massively flawed her methods are, since she only has a sample population of one....
|
There is knowledge for knowledge’s sake. Collecting and collating, gathering and garnering. The worker bees of pure science would indeed feel that a sample population of one is no population at all. After all, if you have only one data point you have no reference point. In another forum my signature line reads "Absent a mechanism for connecting symbol structures to experienced reality, thinking is nothing more than empty symbol crunching."
Charles S. Peirce It is quite possible that a single data point when considered separate from the reality of application outside of my particular pair-bond is nothing more than another empty symbol set.
However, there is a key consideration regarding the sample population my Lady is working with that is very relevant to Ratbastid's post. My Lady is not creating data for the benefit of the larger world. There is no intent to add to anything outside of our own relationship. Understand this, she is applying herself to one goal and one goal only. That goal is my own personal pleasure and my complete satisfaction with her and what she does with/to me. My orgasm is her orgasm. My having an ever-upward climb in my sexual satisfaction within our pair-bond makes her happy, fulfilled and satisfied. That sample size of one is the end-goal of her study, her application, her rigour. That in turn means that you need to invert that statement, Ratbastid. My Lady's methods are not massively flawed. Indeed, they are quite the opposite. They are perfectly applied and yielding results which are (trust me in this) very positive.
/threadjack
Now, if Charlatan had not asked if my Lady was just blowing smoke I would have only made my original post regarding some concerns that I had heard about Crompsin's "science". Being the recipient of a dedicated scientist's study in the arts of eros makes it worthwhile to at least let people out there know that true science, when brought into play in this particular manner, is totally awesome
I have responded to Charlatan and let him know that if there are smoke and mirrors being brought into play in the Manor, it is because they are being used as pleasure props.
Any further study, any larger sample size, any other application of what can be learned regarding GoH and increase of pleasure in the RoH is not the concern of this couple. We are doing our own part, using the scientific method to make beautiful love even more so, and we are very happy doing it. If other couples (such as the self-proclaimed sex-geek Shaindra) take what we have been doing and explore/expand on it themselves that is great. It is however, not a goal to go outside our own pair-bond and accumulate data sets involving cocks other than mine
/end threadjack