I am not afraid of discussion. I am leery of starting a thread which I know has the potential to rapidly decay into a..."He shouldn't have been allowed to hurt people" vs. "The 2'nd Amendment lets him blast away with impunity" where both sides become quickly polarized and end up repeating their basic platform over and over again without regard to the OP, which is about this particular guys circumstances and actions.
I am all for a discussion on his particular level of preparedness (or paranoia), whether he personally would have been better served preparing in a different way or even simply handing over his watches, whether you agree with his statements about fellow shopkeepers potentially getting themselves into trouble, etc.
I know this thread will likely go south eventually, but hopefully not before a meaningful discussion runs it's course.
If you dont' think he was responsible, fire away. Just explain why.
__________________
"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery." - Winston Churchill
"All men dream: but not equally. Those who dream by night in the dusty recesses of their minds wake in the day to find that it was vanity: but the dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may act out their dream with open eyes, to make it possible." Seven Pillars of Wisdom, T.E. Lawrence
Last edited by Slims; 04-19-2009 at 11:19 AM..
|