It still supports my argument. An adherence to Christianity, as said above, is highly subjective, and is therefore not something that can be proven. I'm sure if you asked the man if he adhered to Christianity, he would have said yes. How is his opinion any less valid than anyone else's?
I prefer the Webster definition, actually, "One who professes belief in the teachings of Jesus Christ". This man not only believed in the teaching of Jesus Christ, he said so (between cursing and calling atheists insane).
|