View Single Post
Old 06-10-2003, 06:49 AM   #14 (permalink)
platypus
Essen meine kurze Hosen
 
Location: NY Burbs
I just built a machine using the Asus P4<b>P</b>800 Deluxe which is almost identical to the P4C800.

The P4C uses the 875P & ICH5 chipset, a Promise controller to provide SATA and RAID functionality, and includes Intel's new Performance Acceleration Technology The P4P uses the 865PE & ICH5R chipset which integrates SATA and RAID 0 on the south bridge and does not have PAT. See the report at <b> TomsHardware </b>comparing the two. They are neck and neck with regard to speed. The PAT of the P4C doesn't appear to make much of a difference.

For me, it came down to supported ram and price. According to the listing at <b>MonarchComputer </b>, the P4C800 doesn't support Corsair XMS 3200 ram without adjusting to a higher latency. Probably not that important, but the listing for the P4P800 had no such warning. As far as price, at Googlegear, the P4C800 is $187 and the P4P800 is $145. I went for the cheaper board that supported the ram I wanted.

I loaded up with a 3.06 800FSB P4 and a gig of Corsair ram. Although 400Mhz (pc3200) ram is the fastest that can be fully utilized with the 800FSB, I went with Corsair's XMS 3500. It runs at 400 Mhz, but with a slightly lower latency than the XMS 3200. Again, not a very significant difference, but WTF. I want SPEED.

BTW this board rocks. Slicker 'n owl shit and setup couldn't have been easier.

EDIT: Update on the P4P800. Asus has released a bios update that enables Intel's Performance Acceleration Technology on the 865 chip. Now the only real difference between the P4P800 and P4C800 is price.
__________________
Out the 10Base-T, through the router, down the T1, over the leased line, off the bridge, past the firewall...nothing but Net.

Last edited by platypus; 06-12-2003 at 05:03 AM..
platypus is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46