Quote:
Originally Posted by Willravel
That's not much of an argument. To use Jazz's substitution method (minus the wang):
You can't predict that slaves won't be a useful element to economics in the future just because some countries can get by without them recently.
|
from what I understand slavery wasn't expressly written into the constitution in any shape or form. What was added to the constitution was to make sure that freed slaves were in fact the same EQUAL.
You can easily say that the economy you are talking about, are just that since the pittance of wages paid overseas are probably equal to the cost of upkeep of slaves since you had to house, feed, and care, for them.
But this is shifting, if the 8 years of bush continued to 32 years of bush, you'd sit there and just hope every election for an overturn?
__________________
I don't care if you are black, white, purple, green, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, hippie, cop, bum, admin, user, English, Irish, French, Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, Buddhist, Muslim, indian, cowboy, tall, short, fat, skinny, emo, punk, mod, rocker, straight, gay, lesbian, jock, nerd, geek, Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, Independent, driver, pedestrian, or bicyclist, either you're an asshole or you're not.
|