View Single Post
Old 04-07-2009, 11:45 AM   #7 (permalink)
shakran
Tone.
 
shakran's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by braisler View Post
Wow, generalize much? I don't know who you have been driving with, but I don't know a single hypermiler that drives like that. I'm sure that there might be some out there that do, but most of the people that I know who are interested in maxing out fuel economy do not do so at the expense of traffic safety.
Then you should call yourselves high-milers or something to distinguish, because the jackholes I describe have gotten themselves out in the media to the point that when you say hypermiler, that's what people think.




Quote:
Have you ever driven an Insight?
I've driven every product Honda has sold in the US since the 70's, from the CVCC Civic to the NSX. I didn't own all of them, but I've driven 'em. Yes, I've driven the insight. Three of them, in fact. Some of the drawbacks I listed about that car, I don't personally mind - the size, the 2 seats - hell, that was like being in the CRX. But the crappy handling and the acceleration of a freight train was severely underimpressive for the mileage gains, which are so few over the CRX HF. And the HF was a better car to be in, even if it did lack a passenger side mirror and a 3rd steering wheel spoke





Quote:
I did for 2 years. I loved mine. My wife thought it was a little underpowered on acceleration, but it would cruise along at 85 on the interstate no problem.
So will an Aztek, but that doesn't mean people want to buy it, either.


Quote:
As for people not buying it, they had a back log of people waiting to buy one year after year when they came out. And back last year when gas was $4/gallon, some of the 5 year old Insights were selling on Ebay for near their original retail price.
Look, if you only make 3 units of something per month, and you find 6 people per month who want to buy it, you're going to have a backlog. Eventually, a big one. That doesn't mean it was massively popular - it only means they made less than demand, but since they didn't make very many of them. . .

Oh, and during the gas crunch I got an offer of 10,000 bucks on my HF, which in retrospect I probably should have taken them up on Anything with good efficiency was selling at inflated prices when gas was 4 bucks a gallon, not just the Insight.


Quote:
The last sentence there has you sounding a lot like a corporate shill for the auto manufacturers.
No it doesn't. It has me sounding like a realist, and it has you sounding like some of the guys on the CRX forums. "Build the CRX again because I and 24 of my friends really want one!" Well, great, but to be a success you're gonna have to either sell it for about 200 grand a pop or find more people who want one. I'm not saying the Insight was a miserable car. I'm saying that the tradeoff of luxuries, power, and comfort is not worth the relatively minor fuel efficiency gains to most people. This new Insight is more like a car that they'd buy anyway, which means they might consider going the electro-hybrid route.

The original Insight was just like the S2000. They were never meant to sell in volume. They were meant to sell to enthusiasts (one to high MPG enthusiasts, the other to sports car enthusiasts), and to be a "hey dude look at what Honda can do!" lure to get people in the showrooms to look at Accords and Civics. Now they want to make one that appeals to the "masses," so to speak, and I think it's silly to decry that idea considering how much Toyota wiped the floor with them by making a Prius that felt more like a real car (even if it was ugly as hell).



Quote:
Obviously people buy cars for lots of different reasons. Some people want a 300HP SUV that they'll never drive offroad. Others, like myself, would like to buy a car that gets much better than average fuel economy. For that benefit, I'd be willing to give up some power and some luxuries.
In May of last year, right in the middle of the gas spike, the Civic sold over 53 thousand units. In one month. Think you can find even half that number of people /per month/ to buy the original Insight? I'll give you a hint. Honda's not stupid. If they were out there, Honda would have sold to them.

Quote:
I mean, why no newer battery technology with higher power density like LiIon
Because GM bought the patent to high-capacity LiIon batteries and sold it to Texaco. You're not gonna see those batteries powering cars in your lifetime unless someone changes patent law so that companies can't just sit on a patent to thwart progress at the expense of society - something I would wholly support, btw.

Quote:
or LiPolymer?

because they're expensive as hell and you'd have to replace them about every 4-5 years. No one's gonna go for that.

Quote:
Why no plug-in hybrid option with a larger battery pack of any type?
Agreed, but then they should have done that with the first Insight.

Quote:
I just don't see how the new Insight fills any gap in the Honda product line? They've got a hatchback. They've got a high fuel economy sedan. The Insight used to be their flagship of fuel economy and was heralded as the technology of things to come. Now the new Insight is out, and it is a weaker overall offering. 10 years later and it is barely competitive with the Toyota Prius?

I bet they sell more of them than the old Insight. The trouble is societal, not Honda. Americans want big comfortable luxury cars. Hell we get mad if the electric windows don't have auto up. AND down. Look at a new Civic and compare it to one from the 70's. The Civic is bigger than the old Accord for god's sake. They could build us a 100mpg car tomorrow if we'd buy it, but we wouldn't because no one wants a 2 cylinder car with bicycle tires. There is a minimum standard of solidity and luxury that people are willing to accept, and the original insight does not meet that standard with enough people to be a commercially viable car.

You want progress? So do I. I wanted the original insight to do a hell of a lot better than 12mpg over the 1988 HF, but it didn't. I want to abandon hybrid technology altogether because it's stupid. If you have a gallon of milk, whether you drink 2 glasses a day or cut back to 1, you're still gonna run out. It's time to develop a car that runs on genuinely renewable energy rather than bullshit like ethanol, hydrogen, or "slightly less gas."
shakran is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360