So ghost isn't a real thing? Or maybe we can get a definition of "real" that satisfies that ghosts are provably "real".
The truth is that science does not prove that a thing does not exist, simply because of lack of physical evidence. The science does bear out the probability that if it can't be proven, then it most likely doesn't happen, or has been misinterpreted.
All you anti-science people look up what human beings accomplished in the hundred or so thousands of years prior to the scientific method being adopted, and compare that to the very "real" accomplishments of humanity in the hundreds of years since its application. All those ethnic traditions got us was rocks, sticks, mud huts, a quick death, and slavery. Thanks Traditions!!!!
I'll side with science. It's not real for me, without some proof. Very real proof, based on empirical evidence, and the scientific method.....
We know that people have these experiences, we just don't know why yet. Ta da
__________________
bill hicks - "I don't mean to sound bitter, cold, or cruel, but I am, so that's how it comes out."
|