View Single Post
Old 06-10-2003, 02:50 AM   #35 (permalink)
Loki
Psycho
 
Location: Drifting.
Quote:
Originally posted by Podmore
That is <i>such</i> a rationalization. Any time you take something that doesn't belong to you, it's stealing. The fact of the matter is that a LOT of people who steal software would find a way to pay for it if they had to. ANd you know what? If everyone who used it paid for it, it would be cheaper for all of us. Piracy drives prices up, and there's a lot of evidence to that fact.

People who create things have to make an investment to do so. It really sucks to use their creation without paying them for it. I don't see how you can justify it.

so, say you see a one hundred dollar bill, or even a five dollar bill lying around on the gutter, if you pick it up, is that considered stealing?

Or a perhaps a bit of paper?

Or finding a really useful document on the internet that you decide to save for later on (even though the author has in no way given you permission to download it?)

Or knocking off a brand new Porsche or Ferrari? (Hell, even a Datsun 180B)

there are degrees to stealing, and stealing a copy of an infinitely re-copyable item doesnt rate that particularly highly in my book.

You say that piracy is directly correlational to cost. In order for this to occur, a critical assumption has to be fulfilled:

MS can make too much money, and will do something to reduce the amount of money they make.

Think about it. Lets say that tomorrow, magically, every single person repents thier evil ways, and decide to go legitimate. All of a sudden, MS is going to have a massive influx of cash, resulting in greater profits. In order for the price of thier software to go down, subsequently, MS would be required to cut the initial price of their software, which would result in less profits. A representation:

(n.b. this is a simplified model, assuming that MS regularly releases products, and everyone buys said products... Just to be used for illustration purposes only)

1) 1st Quarter, everyone goes legit, and microsoft records a massive increase in profits. Share prices skyrocket.
2) 2nd Quarter, MS drops prices, and due to this, lose billions of dollars of profit (a $50 dollar loss over twenty million users, lets say). Share prices tumble, because markets operate on speculation, i.e. growth/diminishment of profit, not actual profit.

So, MS loses a ton of money, and additionally, thier share prices tumble. Do you think its likely for MS to do that?
Loki is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360