Quote:
Originally Posted by dippin
Growth in nominal GPD is meaningless and in no way constitutes "economic growth." For nominal GDP to actually go down, real GDP would have to decline more than inflation.
I stand by my comment.
|
"Nominal GDP growth is meaningless", if true why did Obama include it in his budget?
I think you stated what I wrote was a lie. It is not. Your position is now one of playing semantics. Regardless of inflation (which many dispute the accuracy of anyway) growth is growth.
---------- Post added at 08:43 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:43 PM ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Derwood
oh, the irony
|
Is what I did name calling, or is it truth?