View Single Post
Old 03-27-2009, 09:05 AM   #26 (permalink)
shakran
Tone.
 
shakran's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marvelous Marv View Post
It must be a pretty clear-cut case when I agree with shakran
Take deep breaths and try to relax. I'm sure it won't happen again.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Frosstbyte View Post
My post was a general->specific construction. I don't think there's any problem with searching backpacks and lockers at school-hence, broad constitutional question. If you notice, I agree that they screwed up by strip searching her, because they weren't going to find anything that posed any immediate risk.

My problems with this case are the incredibly extreme damages the girl is claiming and how you go about drawing the legal line between the general notion that students shouldn't have a reasonable expectation about privacy in school and what that allows school administrators to do.
I don't find them to be extreme damages. As Snowy pointed out, we are talking about teenaged girls here. Girls that age tend to get traumatized by what we might see as relatively minor events. And I doubt any of us would consider it a minor event if we were made to strip off in front of someone - imagine how the girl, who is much more sensitive to traumatic events than we are, and who may as many girls that age do have body image issues, must have felt with 2 adults who are supposed to be on the team keeping her safe, force her to strip and ogle her while she does it.

I wouldn't call it rape either, and I wouldn't call it sexual assault, because there doesn't seem to have been a sexually-motivated aspect to the situation, but I would certainly call it criminal.

I'll point out that we live in a climate now where if a kid is doing poorly in a class all she has to do is claim the teacher touched her breast to get rid of him for the rest of the semester while the school investigates him and drags his name through the mud. We live in a climate now where teachers are afraid to hug their students for fear of being slammed with sexual assault, and yet here a principal and two staff members collaborate in forcing a girl to strip? Not only is that mind-bogglingly stupid from a self preservation point of view (and I really don't want mind-bogglingly stupid people in charge of my kid's education, thank you), but it points an interesting finger at society, which thinks it's horrible to hug a kid, but seems to be divided on whether or not it's OK to force a child to disrobe in front of staff.
shakran is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360