Quote:
Originally Posted by Strange Famous
What you must understand is that morality comes into this. The law is not a mathematical formula applied by a machine, it is a process governed by human beings. The judge just needs to look at the pictures of Rihann'a battered face to decide what Brown deserves, not some 100 page document about reasons to go easy on criminals.
|
no what you must understand is that the 100 page document exists for a reason. A judge is bound to not put his own morality into a sentence. A trial exists for the factual reasonings..not the moral reasonings, because morality is subjective. There is no one set standard of morality. To blanket everyone under one definition of morality does nothing.
The law exists for a reason, just as the factors exist for a reason. You say there are none in this case, but, you don't know the whole story and cannot come to that conclusion by any means other than your own vision of morality.
this is why you are wrong. not because you can't read. you're wrong as a whole on the entire process of the justice system in the united states.