View Single Post
Old 03-17-2009, 09:21 AM   #14 (permalink)
roachboy
 
roachboy's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: essex ma
there seem to me two levels of maybe interesting stuff in this--the first has to do with the micro-level dynamics at the whole foods union square store. on that we clearly do not have the full story. on the surface of it, the situation is absurd and makes whole foods look like assholes. which in some ways, they are---but i am not sure that this is an indication of any of those ways.

the other matter is what supermarkets do with food like tuna sandwiches made that morning, and why it makes sense for them to throw that sort of thing out--and why so many supermarkets prefer to throw out food that nears expiration dates rather than do something else with it. food retailers are typically one of the largest sources of commercial waste in cities--between the food they jettison and the excess packaging they generate and the material the food is shipped in...the numbers i've seen fluctuate between 20-30 percent of the total commercial waste for cities (these numbers for the uk and canada---where this issue has come up more explicitly---i don't have time to search up information for the states, but i can't imagine the amounts of waste generated by supermarkets would change that much---but the percentage of the total commercial waste might well.)

it's a curious thing to wonder about why an outlet like whole foods would be so attentive to questions of "organic" and to a lesser extent "sustainably produced" food---even as they are among the outlets who function to drain these terms of meaning as a result of the scale of their operations--and this is a kinda complicated question to think about, but anyway---why an outlet that markets itself around categories like sustainablity and/or organic and/or natural would not pay more attention to the practices of it's individual outlets and maybe do something else with the food waste they generate.

what's implied by the article is that whole foods just throws out alot of food.
typically the argument for doing that is cost-effectiveness---it's cheaper.
but there are other alternatives: why not cycle non-expired food through food banks, or compost it?

it's a strange kind of oversight.
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear

it make you sick.

-kamau brathwaite
roachboy is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360