View Single Post
Old 02-22-2009, 07:38 PM   #19 (permalink)
ngdawg
peekaboo
 
ngdawg's Avatar
 
Location: on the back, bitch
Quote:
Originally Posted by JumpinJesus View Post
In that light, I'm not sure what art-snob elitism has to do with this thread.

This thread was about the quality if creative content and how the deluge of poor quality creative content makes it difficult for those with actual talent to have a place to be noticed simply because those with the distribution power find it more profitable to market cheap product.

You work in television if I remember correctly. I'm sure that there are a lot of shows that don't make it on the air. There must be some level of quality control or is the selection of programming random with no regard to quality content?
If you were to go thru a site like Deviant Art or Flickr, you can see they each run the gamut from "refridgerator art" to professionals.
I don't see a problem with this, really. If some 13 year old wants to put her lousy drawings online so grandma can show her clueless Bingo buddies, what's the harm in it?
Things have always been like this. Is Annie Liebowitz really THAT talented or lucky? An ad came to work touting a photography show at a prestigious gallery in Manhattan and they showed one of the photographer's pieces in the ad.(not Leibowitz)
To say my boss was agast would be an understatement. The image looked like one of those "what's wrong with this picture" games. But she's not the one with the exclusive show. It's all in the salesmanship.

You can't dictate taste anymore than you can fix stupid. Everyone might think they're being cheated out of their due because someone with less talent is getting the notices but it's like street vendors-if one corner is crowded, find another corner.

Mediocrity may prevail because most people are mediocre. But I do think there is room for real talent and when it's there, it is noticed. I just also happen to think that because of such easy access to all things technical, we're seeing it more in all forms.

As for "reality shows"-they're just a cheaper way to gain advertising dollars. If people would stop leaving them on for background noise, they'd eventually dry up. They're a result of cheap laziness.
__________________
Don't blame me. I didn't vote for either of'em.
ngdawg is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360