View Single Post
Old 02-22-2009, 08:40 AM   #1 (permalink)
JumpinJesus
Junkie
 
Location: Chicago
User-created content and Mt. Ararat.

Are reality television and user-created content on the Internet the cultural equivalent of the Great Flood?

Aside from the explosion of on-line shopping, the Internet is probably best known for its user-created content. Sites like YouTube and the endless sea of blogs have given every single person with access to the Internet and the motivation the ability to create their own content for their own and their friends’ consumption. Once in a while, a cultural supernova explodes and a new meme is created or a new YouTube sensation is uncovered – for 15 minutes, of course. All it takes is a jovially overweight fellow lip-synching to the latest Euro-trash song for the rest of us to clap our hands excitedly and squeal with delight. It’s even better if he dances or falls down. Better still if she’s very attractive and dumb. The overwhelming idea here is that it takes absolutely no creativity or forethought to create content that will get the masses all a-twitter over the latest craze. You know you’ve hit it big if you see your pixelated capture while the hosts joke about it on your morning news program.

User-created content has become so wide-spread that even news organizations such as CNN and FOX rely on everyday schmucks to send in their cell phone video captures as an augmentation to their shrinking journalistic staffs.

Television relies more and more on reality-based shows that use every day average people in place of actors to carry out pre-scripted events and hopefully do it in an increasingly antagonistic manner in order to get viewers talking about what they saw. Let’s face it, in an age of 500 digital cable channels, it’s a hell of a lot harder to stand out to the average viewer than it was 20 years ago.

Do a search for blogs. How many are there? How many books are in your local library? I’m almost certain that there are currently more blogs in the blogosphere than the entire count of books ever published. How many bloggers fancy him or herself the next Faulkner, the next Bukowski? The problem is that these bloggers often haven’t the slightest clue how to form a proper sentence, much less how to spell elementary words like ridiculous or definite, much less conjugate certain helping verbs like would have, could have, should have. To make matters worse, we uphold this ignorance as a badge of honor, as if those who might point out the illiterate notions of the communicatively disabled are somehow being stodgy or elitist. It is as if there is pride in illiteracy and we all applaud it.

What this boils down to is that our mass media, pop culture-driven entertainment juggernaut relies more and more heavily on amateur nobodies dying for their 15 minutes of fame in a Titanic-riddled sea of attention seekers. Instant pop stardom is the shattered piece of drift-wood among a sea of drowning wannabes and everybody is clawing to grip on to a piece of board in the freezing waters of irrelevance.
User-created content sites are the modern day, grown-up equivalent to the delusional galleries all parents have in their kitchen where they magnetically adhere their kids’ crappy crayon doodles as masterpieces for all their friends to see and comment on.

“Oh, your Spencer is just so talented!”

“Isn’t that a precious kitty Meghan colored!”

“Look at that tree! It looks so real! Oh, it’s a dump truck? Either way it’s just so precious!”

“Wow, that’s a terrific photograph. You really do have a great eye!”

“That’s the best stick-figure comic I’ve ever read!”

Where does all this leave actual talent, the real, raw, developed talent that only a rare few of all people possess? How much of it gets ignored or lambasted as pretentious by the jealous purveyors of mediocrity? What chance does real talent have when we’re told and we swallow the notion that user-created content, created by people whose only talent is the ability to press a button on their cell-phone or turn on their web-cam, is real, raw, viral, and most of all, authentic? It’s like amateur porn. Sure, it might be unscripted, but it’s often woefully unattractive.

Are we in the midst of a cultural Great Flood where we’re becoming awash in an ocean of mediocrity-held-up-as-genius? Is the chance of discovering a creative walnut in the batter of eternal mediocrity worth the price the rest of us pay who must wade through this tripe? Will this torrent ever end? Where’s the cultural Noah’s Ark?
__________________
"I can normally tell how intelligent a man is by how stupid he thinks I am" - Cormac McCarthy, All The Pretty Horses
JumpinJesus is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360