Quote:
Originally posted by gibber71
Perhaps an even better idea would be eye recognition( The correct name fails me).That would be very expensive especially for portable units.But it would be accessable to and for everyone, and much quicker to know exactly who the person is. But then again,people will complain that Big Brother has to much info on people.
|
Retinal scans aren't nearly as intrusive as DNA scans. I have no problem with retinal scans or fingerprint scans, but the fact is that they're too expensive to be a viable solution right now. When fingerprint scanning or retinal scanning becomes cheap enough we can switch over to those. But until then all you're doing is beating a dead horse. Unless, of course, you want to foot up the HUGE tax increase that would be required to implement these things in such a portable manner as wuold be needed.