Quote:
Originally Posted by roachboy
matthew, i really don't see the utility of these posts of yours.
|
I'm starting to suspect that matthew has been educated by GoPAC. He's basically setting up the premise that nothing can refute his claims because anything that does refute his claims doesn't count because he hasn't heard of the congresswoman, or because it happened more than 30 minutes ago. Or, better yet, we'll just pretend none of this has happened and continue to make our point as though no one has refuted what we've said.
If you watch a typical republican interview on TV, they use tactics exactly like this. You ask them why they did X. They deny doing X. You show them a videotape of them doing X. They still deny doing X, and pretend the tape never happened.
It's really amazing how slickly they pull this off but, ya know what? The public isn't fooled by that crap anymore, because the lies and incompetence have finally hit them in the pocketbook rather than having a theoretical future negative result.