matthew, i really don't see the utility of these posts of yours. your claim that conservatives did not claim that criticism of the bush administration was treasonous is simply false...think about 2003 for example, in the early phases of the iraq debacle.
the claim that conservatives have not argued that criticism of the office of the president is treasonous is so vague as to be meaningless in any event--we all know from long experience that when a republican is in office, there's one set of standards, but when a democrat is in office, there's an entirely different set of standards. on this, of late, the right has been true to form.
there's been clips that refute your claims posted by dc above.
there's been more than ample information posted elsewhere that refutes your claim.
so i don't see you have a leg to stand on as a point of fact.
but then there's the slightly broader question of what exactly you're hoping to accomplish by sticking with this line of argumentation, even if you put aside the fact that it's already been shown repeatedly to be false.
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear
it make you sick.
-kamau brathwaite
|