View Single Post
Old 06-09-2003, 02:38 PM   #93 (permalink)
gibber71
Loser
 
Quote:
Originally posted by Atanvarno


Then comes another issue, if the case a religion forbids it's members to be photographed at all, and there is an alternate form of identification that is as good, should the state allow the use of such a form of identification?
Well I don't know.What is it that you have in mind? The only other proof of identity I'm thinking of other than a photo would be DNA testing or fingerprinting, and I think that opens up a new can of worms with many pending problems.
gibber71 is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37