Quote:
|
1) How the hell is it the Government's right, even if they DO give money to these companies, to make demands on CEO compensation? Last time I checked, neither the Executive branch nor the Legislative branch aren't given any such powers in the Constitution! Let the marketplace will sort it out.
|
A loan company has full right to tell people how they are to use loaned money until it's paid in full. This is a similar situation.
Quote:
|
2) ALL CEO's compensations should be limited, anyhow. I think that the gap between the normal salary in a company and the CEO's salary has gotten way out of hand. I think that it should be limited to some multiple of the mean salary in the company. The way it exists now, the CEO does a GOOD job by keeping the workers' salaries low, or by shipping jobs overseas, where labor is cheap. By limiting salaries to a multiple of the mean workers' salaries, there is actually an incentive to keep jobs in the US!
|
I figure if the CEO runs the company well, the company should decide how much it's worth. The companies clearly were mismanaged, if they were so mismanaged they need government aid then the CEOs should not retain their massive income.
Quote:
|
And then my head explodes from the conflict.
|
I prefer to bang my head against my desk, it releases the pressure before it completely explodes.