View Single Post
Old 02-04-2009, 08:00 AM   #8 (permalink)
roachboy
 
roachboy's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: essex ma
i'm a bit confused by this tempest in a teapot as well. i remember watching the dismantling of the american steel and iron industries across the 1980s. one of the central symbolic moments was the transition from us steel to us-x, the transition from steel manufacturer to holding company. this process unfolded in plain sight--among the side phenomena it produced was the emergence of ceo's who specialized in riding out implosions and/or bankruptcies and deriving profit--and often quite alot of it--from the process. i don't know where people were at that point in terms of getting all huffy about the transformations of industrial geography and it's implications for quaint notions like "national sovereignty"....that's all done now effectively. all done. nothing to complain about really as we all sat around and watched it happen---maybe because we weren't being told that there were Problems that attended this process many of us didn't see that there were any--only now are folk waking up from their neoliberal slumbers and trying to figure out what the fuck happened.

there are alot of reasons for the transformation of steel production. but i don't have time to make a primer at the moment---maybe the article tislyoni posted above will help in this respect. but think continuous casting in the longer durée, and the transnationalization of stock ownership in the medium durée, and the delusion of "free trade" in the shorter one.


i was going to post data about the international steel & iron trades over the past decade but thought that the format i found was maybe a bit opaque.

it seems to me that this "buy american" gesture is largely meaningless, so i'm not sure what folk are getting all bent about. the united states imports vastly more steel than it produces, and vastly more than it exports. it's not obvious what kinds of ownership extends through steel industry style supply chains at this point either. what is obvious is that "buy american" means outstripping capacity to produce within the territorial limits of the united states. the only way that meme could function would be for it to be linked to an industrial sector policy aimed at re-growing a domestically oriented steel production infrastructure through one or another adaptation of miti or some such. i think such a move would be a good idea in the longer run, but it isn't present at the moment, so it means nothing.
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear

it make you sick.

-kamau brathwaite
roachboy is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360