Quote:
Originally Posted by roachboy
fact is, ace, that whatever you might think of ahmadinejad, the fact is that he has relatively little power in iran, first.
second, most of the rest of the planet will be perfectly content to see him loose power, and there are elections coming within the next month or so.
and there's a consensus which you might not know about because you haven't looked into it that he relied on the non-strategy of the bush people to maintain his position---he used it, relied on it---so changing that relationship, and doing it in a high profile way, puts him at a disadvantage.
proof is in the pudding, i suppose--what happens in the next election.
i wouldn't be surprised if he lost.
then what, ace?
|
If a different person is in place, a person interested in resolving conflict rather than inflaming them, I would be willing to work on a mutual agreement or statement concerning the past actions of both nations that may have caused problems and may still hinder progress.
Upon further thought of the past few posts. I think the real problem is that my reason simply was not perceived as good enough. And I was being asked to present a better reason. But rather than engaging in being phony I stuck with my real reason.