Maybe I'm weird, but I don't see gay/straight/black/white/male/female thing in the military as all the social constructs that exist out in the civvie world.
I see it as raw materials, stats, doing-the-math of who can shoot, move, and communicate.
Race? Not an issue. Sexual orientation? Not an issue. Gender? The "move" part is a problem.
Females in combat arms:
Shoot - Studies have shown that the female hand is wired better to use firearms than the male hand due to a better ability to independently use the fingers.
Communicate - Most of the military communicates on a third grade level. That's not an issue. Studies have shown that women actually make better leaders than men in non-combat occupations due to their method of leadership being more lesson-oriented instead of punishment/reward.
Move - Problem. That's simple strength and endurance. The male model of human is generally superior in those categories. Straight biology.
Obviously this a very basic breakdown and misses all sorts of stuff, but you get the idea.
...
Okay. I'm going to go beat my chest and set things on fire.
Last edited by Plan9; 01-20-2009 at 08:25 PM..
|