Quote:
Originally Posted by TheNasty
And yet, we continually read or hear stories with the exact theme.
It must be easy to dismiss cases like these as outliers.
This isn't really an argument for or against letting Unions exist. Under current laws Unions exist and are thriving.
This is legislation to make Unions even more powerful. Knowing the current market place, do we need this, or are Unions fulfilling their function as intended under the current laws?
From all the personal experiences I've read over many different forums, it seems to me that Unions already are doing the task they are intended to do, in many different areas of the economy. What is the reasoning to giving them even more power?
Why should this be seen as anything other than an Obama administration tipping its' hat to a group that helped him get elected?
|
AFL/CIO gave millions to the obama campaign. nothing else can be expected.
HOWEVER
let it be duly noted that at this current time only 7% of workers are unionized in the US...compared to 50% in the 1950s and 30% in the 1970s...
Quote:
Originally Posted by filtherton
That is why I don't support anything.
|
That's a bullshit excuse for apathy