Quote:
Originally Posted by Derwood
with all due respect, those workers are retards and give unions a bad name
|
And yet, we continually read or hear stories with the exact theme.
It must be easy to dismiss cases like these as outliers.
This isn't really an argument for or against letting Unions exist. Under current laws Unions exist and are thriving.
This is legislation to make Unions even more powerful. Knowing the current market place, do we need this, or are Unions fulfilling their function as intended under the current laws?
From all the personal experiences I've read over many different forums, it seems to me that Unions already are doing the task they are intended to do, in many different areas of the economy. What is the reasoning to giving them even more power?
Why should this be seen as anything other than an Obama administration tipping its' hat to a group that helped him get elected?