Quote:
Originally Posted by roachboy
back to the op:
i happened to catch some of the attorney general confirmation hearing last night on c-span (my new favorite reality show outlet)...there was an exchange about "concerns originating with the second amendment crowd" that might be illuminating for my colleagues on the right. the jist of the exchange was that the obama administration has no plan to alter gun control parameters--not only that but he cannot imagine the administration undertaking such action. prerogatives on gun issues will then remain with the states. this in response to questions from a republican senator whose name eludes me (as does the name of obama's ag nominee--i keep thinking heller, but that's also the name used to refer to the main existing precedent on gun issues) and another from leahey.
the republican senator kept pressing for a yes/no answer to a hypothetical question and did not, in the end, seem to find the exchange to be entirely satisfactory--but i would think it enough to calm down the gun folk who imagine that there will be some kind of immediate change in the legal framework that enables them to procure their Important Implements.
|
despite holders newfound respect for the individual right protected by the second amendment, his remarks during that hearing confirm that he believes 'reasonable restrictions' can still be implemented like an assault weapons ban. I firmly believe that this will again be attempted, and I almost hope that they do, because the political fallout will be even harsher than it was in 94.
__________________
"no amount of force can control a free man, a man whose mind is free. No, not the rack, not fission bombs, not anything. You cannot conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him."
|