View Single Post
Old 01-02-2009, 04:22 PM   #27 (permalink)
dc_dux
 
dc_dux's Avatar
 
Location: Washington DC
Quote:
Originally Posted by aceventura3 View Post
If "regulators" want to try and make the market idiot proof they can put in "requirements" all day long based on what an informed investor would look for - but at the end of the day no "requirement" will protect anyone from dishonesty or even incompetence. Caveat emptor - that is the best market regulator.
Regulation worked pretty well between 1929 and the Glass-Stengall Act.....until the deregulation of the S&Ls in the 80s and the deregulation of commercial and investment banking in 2000.

There has always been fraud, dishonest, greed... but regulatory oversight keeps it in check far greater than the "invisible hand" or caveat emptor..
__________________
"The perfect is the enemy of the good."
~ Voltaire

Last edited by dc_dux; 01-02-2009 at 04:25 PM..
dc_dux is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47