Quote:
Originally Posted by Willravel
This is completely incorrect. Are you making this up or do you have a source that's making it up?
Obama didn't want doctors punished for obeying existing laws. There's nothing in there about permission. Oh, and the version Obama supported ended up passing and now infants are protected.
|
In laymans terms, it means that they did not want the docs to have to wait on another to determine if the fetus was viable. It means he didn't want the doctors punished for killing a live baby. You're reading the bill without seeing what it means to the end user.
Quote:
|
Do you know what an ad hom fallacy is?
|
Yes, you're doing it with that statement right there. Ignore the fact, deflect it, or whatever and spout some common as cornbread "I took a debate/critical thinking class one time" argument type to sound intelligent and further deflect.
Edit a little: Why is it ad hominem for me to let you know who runs the show there, and not ad hominem to say Dr. Tim Ball (the first respected scientist to deny global warming) works for an oil company? Is it because Media Matters doesn't have an agenda, but Dr. Ball does?
lol