Quote:
Originally Posted by Dead_man
Yes, the language he wanted to fix was the language that stated he didn't want the doctor performing the abortion to have to wait on another doctor to tell if the fetus was viable or not.
|
This is completely incorrect. Are you making this up or do you have a source that's making it up?
Senator Obama wanted the following added:
Quote:
(c) Nothing in this Section shall be construed to affirm, deny, expand, or contract any legal status or legal right applicable to any member of the species homo sapiens at any point prior to being born alive, as defined in this Section.
(d) Nothing in this Section shall be construed to affect existing federal or State law regarding abortion.
(e) Nothing in this Section shall be construed to alter generally accepted medical standards.
|
Illinois General Assembly - Illinois Compiled Statutes
Obama didn't want doctors punished for obeying existing laws. There's nothing in there about permission. Oh, and the version Obama supported ended up passing and now infants are protected.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dead_man
Anyone who cites media matters (a subsidiary of George Soros and founded in part by the Clintons) as factual, then calls Fox news biased needs a little reality check. Media matters is the Wikipedia of liberalism. Facts are changed on the basis of what makes who look bad and if they are for us or against us.
|
Do you know what an ad hom fallacy is?
-----Added 29/12/2008 at 01 : 49 : 20-----
Quote:
Originally Posted by thingstodo
Hey Will: here's the blogger's response to your note:
|
Why would the blogger have a response to my post? Oh. That really wasn't necessary.