12-28-2008, 05:17 PM
|
#208 (permalink)
|
Living in a Warmer Insanity
Super Moderator
Location: Yucatan, Mexico
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Infinite_Loser
This article is so blatantly wrong on so many topics, I don't even know where to begin.
I'll just start with this. Obviously, this guy never decided to bother to learn a lick about Christian theology, otherwise he would know that Levitical (Probably not a word, but whatever) law is divided into civic law, ceremonial law and moral law. Civic law applies only to Jews, ceremonial law is no longer applicable (That is, we don't have to offer up a ram and go to a Levi priest to atone for our sins) and moral law applies to, well, morals and is still valid today. If there are no propositions on eating shellfish and wearing different types of clothes, it's because there's no reason for there to be.
(Overly simplified, but you get the point.)
No, it's not. Apparently, he never read the NT.
Edit: And, no, David was not gay. That's eisegesis at it's worst to suggest as much. And I *think* he had something like 13 wives, though it was probably more. Not totally sure :P
|
Well since there's no props on shellfish why are there ones on homosexuality?
And how do you know whether or not David was gay?
__________________
I used to drink to drown my sorrows, but the damned things have learned how to swim- Frida Kahlo
Vice President Starkizzer Fan Club
|
|
|