Quote:
Originally Posted by Tully Mars
I see that now and you are correct, my mistake.
As for the topic at hand I agree with this article-
Not another word... |
This article is so blatantly wrong on so many topics, I don't even know where to begin.
Quote:
|
The Bible says eating shellfish is an abomination. Yet there are no Red Lobster Amendments. The Bible says you shall not wear two different types of cloths at the same time. Yet there are no Propositions against cotton and wool combos.
|
I'll just start with this. Obviously, this guy never decided to bother to learn a lick about Christian theology, otherwise he would know that Levitical (Probably not a word, but whatever) law is divided into civic law, ceremonial law and moral law. Civic law applies only to Jews, ceremonial law is no longer applicable (That is, we don't have to offer up a ram and go to a Levi priest to atone for our sins) and moral law applies to, well, morals and is still valid today. If there are no propositions on eating shellfish and wearing different types of clothes, it's because there's no reason for there to be.
(Overly simplified, but you get the point.)
Quote:
|
And the just punishment for this sin is execution. So, who will execute the first adulterer? Please step on up. May the one without any Biblical sin cast the first stone.
|
No, it's not. Apparently, he never read the NT.
Edit: And, no, David was not gay. That's eisegesis at it's worst to suggest as much. And I *think* he had something like 13 wives, though it was probably more. Not totally sure :P