View Single Post
Old 12-21-2008, 12:59 AM   #31 (permalink)
ASU2003
immoral minority
 
ASU2003's Avatar
 
Location: Back in Ohio
I'm not sure I would put too much blame on Bush. It true that he wanted the 'ownership' society, and it is good if you can afford it. But there were a lot of other things that created a bubble instead of a smooth and sustainable increase in homeownership and homes being built. The free market failed for most people. It worked for the people who bought up homes and condos as soon as they were built and then resold them for thousands more without ever having lived there. But, taxing real estate investors and speculators hard wouldn't be in line with Bush's policies.

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/...n4666112.shtml

http://www.nowpublic.com/world/60-mi...meltdown-story

Quote:
The bank's own greed got the best of them; all they saw was the dollar signs in their eyes, as fees and points that filled their coffers.

The borrowers were really no less greedy- like I said, I did my best to explain, even tried to talk some borrowers out of using a POA to buy the property that they were interested in. But most times, it was to no avail. They either didn't care about the risks or worse yet, their Realtor "over talked" me and told them that I did not know what I was talking about, and that the POA was their best choice:

Real estate always goes up, remember? It's different here! No need to worry about that negative amortization loan if you stick with the only payment you can really afford, the one with the 1% teaser, your house will be worth double what you paid for it in a year or two!

But, unfortunately, the problem as the banks saw it wasn't that these loans were going to fail in droves, nope.

The problem the banks saw was that the people were using these loans as short-term real estate investment loans with a really low initial payment, giving the investors time to remodel the property in order to "flip" the house and then move on to the next investment without having to sink so much capital into principle and interest with a higher interest commercial loan payment.
Quote:
I'm not real estate expert, but I was working in a planning department of a 200,000+ city. between 2000 and 2004. I would process plats for developers. I remember getting plats for 1000-lot subdivisions for homes that would probably go for $150,000 or so. The town where I live in doesn't have nor will it have enough jobs to generate income needed to buy such homes. I wondered, "Where's the money coming from for these homes?" I guess my gut was right. It was all surfers riding the bubble. And now the wave is crashing like a tsunami.

Last edited by ASU2003; 12-21-2008 at 01:08 AM..
ASU2003 is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360