Quote:
Originally Posted by Bear Cub
What's that got anything to do with it?
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bear Cub
We're not talking about going to great lengths here, we're talking about the 2nd most common undergarment known to man.
|
From what source do you derive this?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bear Cub
Puritanical standards and a modicum of professionalism are two very different extremes.
|
A scintilla of professionalism means not staring at a coworker's chest. There can be absolutely no doubt that people are staring at this woman's chest and then discussing it later.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bear Cub
Material thickness doesn't mean shit if her breasts are noticeably "unsheathed," which they obviously were if the manager was able to pick up on it, on multiple occasions.
|
So what? Where is it written that without a bra a woman is not work appropriate? It's an extreme and overly prudish idea. As someone that's run two offices, I know it's bullshit. There are absolutely situations in even the most professional office environments that wearing a bra would be optional, and there are certainly garments which can render a bra-less chest perfectly appropriate. Did you even click on the link to the wool sweater I posted?