Quote:
Originally Posted by Willravel
So forcibly raped by women, the stats go from 1 in 33 to 1 in 330? That's a serious difference. And even that statistic stinks to high heaven.
I'd guess I've known about 900 men in my life. Statistically, then, abut 3 of those men have forcibly been raped by a woman? There are about 600,000 men in San Jose. Statistically, then, at least 1800 San Jose men have been raped by a woman? Forgive me, but without rather serious verifiable statistics, this seems like nonsense. And since verifiable statistics on male rape really don't exist yet, I'm afraid I have to call BS.
|
UCSC Rape Prevention Education: Rape Statistics
I can't make any promises how reliable those numbers are. Certainly it supports the notion that the vast majority of sexual crimes are by men against either women or men.
The point of this conversation centers around the fact that SF seems to claim that women writ large are incapable of sexual assaulting a man and that it has never happened, period, which means that what these girls did could not be anything other than horsing around. Even if only one man has ever been sexually assaulted by a woman, it would disprove that assertion, and there is no doubt that it has happened, albeit rarely.