View Single Post
Old 12-05-2008, 01:37 PM   #102 (permalink)
Glory's Sun
Registered User
 
no body is talking about erections or such. the simple black and white.. and COMMON SENSE factors in this case are as follows:

Spitting water on a resident, lying in bed with a resident, touching a resident on the buttocks, inserting her finger into a resident’s rectum, antagonizing a resident, humping a resident and putting her hand over a resident’s mouth because that resident would scream.

so let's take this one by one shall we?? Maybe this will provide some clear thinking.

Spitting water in the face-- not an assault but, a very offensive thing to do especially to someone who cannot defend themselves.

Lying in bed with a resident--again not an assault, but something that probably isn't in the job description.

Touching a resident on the buttocks-simple assault and sexual harassment. Unless the patient explicitly asked for a touch on the buttocks then it is sexual harassment. Plain and clearly simple.

Insertion of finger into rectum--sexual assault and sexual harassment. If the action was not consented to or done for a purely medical reason, it's a form of rape. Plain and clearly simple.

Antagonizing a resident-- until I know the expansion of the antagonizing I can't comment on this one.

Humping a resident-- now I'm assuming this is for all intensive purposes dry humping or humping such as a dog would do. --assault of a very demeaning nature (much more demeaning than calling them children) and again sexual harassment. Unless the person said "hey cutie, come hump my leg like a dog"

Putting a hand over a residents mouth in order to get the patient to scream-- assault and if you have a good lawyer.. you could pull an attempted murder charge off of this.

So I ask.. who is clearly thinking? Who is really looking at this in black and white?? I'm all for due process and won't assume the girls are guilty until proven to be so, however, if they are found guilty and the evidence shown proves this without any doubt, then yes they should get whatever sentence is merited in the law. They will have abused people who have no way of defending themselves. This is no different than preying on children. Children cannot defend themselves and neither can people in this type of situation.

Now. what are we confused about exactly? Why does it matter if it's a girl or a boy doing these acts? Does it really matter? I don't want to hear some lame ass excuse about the female makeup because if we want to paint with such broad strokes.. all the English are just power hungry murderers who want to control everyone with cunty fingers.

Instead of ignoring what the academics write and going off on some common sense avenue..look at all the evidence presented.. there are many academics spouting the same stats.. and.. one person's common sense is another person's ignorance. Just because you spout common sense doesn't mean you actually have it. In this case, SF, you lack it.


Quote:
Originally Posted by SF
It is certainly the case that any man can prevent an erection at any time - simply by thinking of something that is unattractive.
hrmm that's funny.

I can think of the most horrific and disgusting things known to man, and if my wife is playing with me, I'll still get an erection.
Glory's Sun is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76