View Single Post
Old 12-04-2008, 09:27 PM   #11 (permalink)
Willravel
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by ngdawg View Post
You question my position on the sexuality of women?
There's no question, you're attacking someone and you didn't support your position well.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ngdawg View Post
According to the OP in that forum, she was told "easy to see that i wasn't using a bra when i was active. If people was distracted by me (she claimed) that's not really my problem." Sorry, but to me, that's a dumb statement for her to make. It is her problem and she created it.
That depends, really. If she works with prudes, it's possible that she's acting within social norms and isn't "dumb" at all. Or are you under the impression that there aren't any prudes in the world?
Quote:
Originally Posted by ngdawg View Post
Now, how "active" could she be if the place is an office? Walking. "Smaller than average" breasts don't show a lot of "activity" walking.
Let's not pretend that the only C cups or above move when a woman is walking. And how many offices have stairs? That's additional movement.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ngdawg View Post
Sorry, but she's being indignant about something that she's creating herself.
That's not "an ounce of sexuality". That's arrogance. And, yes, sexuality doesn't belong in a professional environment unless it's a Vegas stage show.
You seem to have a problem with women being sexual. Either you're wearing a bra or you're a Vegas show girl? That's completely dishonest.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ngdawg View Post
I wear SUPPORT bras and still show "activity" but I'm not flaunting it nor do I get indignant when there's a comment made (but since I don't flaunt, any comment is usually in a joking manner). I also don't make it a point to flaunt because it's in a working environment. There's a huge, HUGE difference between trying to look your best and being a showoff. And if anyone is going to be a showoff, they sure as hell shouldn't complain about it when they're called out on it.

I don't buy that "who, little ol' me??" stuff ever once a person is over the age of 5.
You're jumping into this assuming she's being overtly sexual because there was a complaint. I'm saying that complaint is not enough evidence. It's certainly not enough to call someone, especially a new member, an ass.
Willravel is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360