how do you expect someone to take you seriously when you said you didn't bother to read past half the sentence answering your other question?
how do you expect someone to prosecute for a crime that has to be proven when the basis of the complaint is statistical trends that are hard to discern based on the fact that factors relevant to the crime aren't being collected?
that is, the trend says something but can't definitively conclude it's based on race because lenders don't collect that data...but you think any prosecutor, state or federal, would be able to take the case without the evidence of race based exclusionary policies?
__________________
"The theory of a free press is that truth will emerge from free discussion, not that it will be presented perfectly and instantly in any one account." -- Walter Lippmann
"You measure democracy by the freedom it gives its dissidents, not the freedom it gives its assimilated conformists." -- Abbie Hoffman
|