|
I didn't jump in to discuss religion.
I started by asking the relevance of errors in science - and I ask again. What is the relevance.
Lets say that a study concludes that disease X is not caused by Y as initially thought, but is caused by Z instead... Does this invalidate modern medical research? I would say that it doesn't. Ditto for the fields more directly associated with "science".
So I'm questioning the OP point on that basis, in relation to science. Not in relation to religion.
|