Quote:
Originally posted by Sparhawk
Let's play devil's advocate for a moment, and suppose that saddam didn't have weapons of mass destruction. How then would prove that he didn't have them?
|
Governments have a tendency to record what they do. They would have records of what was destroyed, when it was destroyed, and where. Hell they'd even have the pay stubs from the poor SOB who destroyed it. Iraq had none of these.