Quote:
Originally Posted by allfullup
*snip*
That said, the OP threw a two-word phrase out there and so far three posters projected the conniving bitch scenario onto it.
Is it really such a far-fetched idea that someone might intentionally regulate the availability of sex to make their partner want it more, and that both partners may well get a perfectly healthy charge out of it?
|
I was operating under the assumption that the withholding of sex was done without consideration for the partner and his or her well-being and without open discussion. Even with the intention of increasing the desire for sex, I believe that it is fundamentally wrong for that to be done without acceptance by the partner. Lacking proper communication, you are opening up room for the partner to interpret your actions in a negative light, so they could potentially believe that you are withholding sex for selfish reasons or through a lack of desire for them.